Monthly Archive for May, 2011

The Economics of Unhappiness

From John Quiggin, The Chronicle of Higher Education

For at least the past decade, there has been a boom in work on the economics of happiness. But recalling Tolstoy’s famous opening lines in Anna Karenina, I’ve always wondered why we don’t study the economics of unhappiness instead. After all, we have so much more data.

The American tradition is to enshrine economic activity as a central element of “the pursuit of happiness.” In reality, however, economic activity is largely concerned with the relief of unhappiness. At the subsistence level of economic activity that has prevailed through most of human history, people must work to eat and to be clothed and housed, not so that they can enjoy the happiness that these goods can bring but so that they can avoid the pain of hunger, cold, and exposure to the elements.

In developed economies, most of us can assuage these fundamental sources of unhappiness. But whether because of drives inherent in our nature or because of the constant efforts of advertisers and others, we seem destined to remain unhappy with our economic lot.

To Read More…

Office Politics: Behind the Scenes at the Start of Microsoft

From The Economist

Asked to pen an endorsement for Paul Allen’s new autobiography, Bono, a well-known musician, declares that the co-founder of Microsoft’s “…intellect and generosity of spirit are there on every page”. He is only half right. “Idea Man” does provide plenty of insights into the ways in which Mr Allen has helped revolutionise everything from software to space travel. But its pages are also permeated by a bitterness towards Bill Gates, the man with whom he created a company that transformed the world of technology. Indeed, there are enough sour grapes in these pages to fill an entire vineyard.

The irony is that the primary focus of Mr Allen’s resentment—his co-founder’s intense competitiveness—is also one of the things that propelled Microsoft to greatness. That trait, and the tension that it provoked between the two men, is evident from the time they meet at school. Mr Allen describes how Mr Gates became apoplectic when a practical joke he played on Mr Allen backfired. In another vignette, he portrays his pal sweeping the pieces off a chessboard in fury when he lost yet another game to Mr Allen.

To Read More…

Management Journal, Volume 10, Number 10 available

management_frontThe tenth issue of Volume 10 of The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management has now been published.

Volume 10, Number 10 contains:

Announcing the Winner of the International Award for Excellence

Congratulations to Frank Habermann the winner of the International Award for Excellence in the area of knowledge, culture and change in organizations with his paper Towards a Federated Architecture for Change Management: Lessons Learned from Quality Management and other Management Areas.

Abstract: In the past, federated concepts have proven successful for coping with key business challenges such as quality management, customer relationship management, performance management and talent management. All these management disciplines show several common characteristics: (1) They focus on core business objects (i.e. quality, customer relations, performance, talent, etc.) that are, (2) socially influenced, abstract, multi-dimensional and thus hard to measure, and they (3) do not belong to a single (vertical) business line but instead, (4) have many (horizontal) instances, and (5) the strategic relevance is widely accepted. The same is true for change management! This paper will therefore explain how the institutionalization of change management can benefit from the above listed concepts, technologies and experiences. Particularly common management myths will be discussed. Consequently, this paper proposes a federated framework for managing change. The federated approach implies an open and modular “community of change” whereby the members maintain autonomy whilst being part of the federation. Since federation in contrast to integration accepts existing political, cultural, organizational and technical boundaries, the outlined concept does not require a big bang or sophisticated feasibility study, it can start directly, driven by local business needs and urgent challenges.

.

Abstract:

Patently Absurd: If America Wants More Innovation, Why on Earth is it Cutting the Budget of its Patent Office?

From The Economist

Innovation and jobs have become a modern version of motherhood and apple pie in Washington, DC. Everyone in America’s capital wants lots more of both, or so they say. So how come Congress and the White House have decided not merely to underfund a crucial cog in American’s innovation machine but actually to take away revenue it earns? And that at a time when that cog, the Patent and Trademark Office, is already struggling to keep up with the growing demands upon it? The recent budget deal for fiscal 2011 (the year to September 30th) allows the Patent Office to spend only $2.1 billion. That is less than it expects to collect in fees from applicants—$100m or so will disappear instead into Treasury coffers—and far less than it needs to do its job properly.

Ever since Thomas Jefferson became the first head of what became the Patent Office in 1790 and decided to grant patents only to innovations that were useful and genuinely novel, America’s system of intellectual property has played a crucial role in generating economic growth, encouraging inventors and entrepreneurs by ensuring that they can make money from their good ideas. Last year the Patent Office granted 244,358 patents out of the applications it examined. Although you can debate how many jobs are created on average per patent, there is no doubt that, collectively, they are a useful contribution to an economy that is still struggling to grow.

To Read More…

2011 Management Conference Dinner – Reserve Your Tickets Now

Please join us for a traditional Spanish dinner at  Mama Lila Restaurant.  The menu includes grilled fresh vegetables, and a choice of entree including Paella and Grilled Beef.  Mama Lila is located near the Universidad San Pablo CEU, walking directions will be provided at the conference.

For more information please visit the conference web-site.

Management Journal Award Finalists

management_frontCongratulations to to all of the International Award for Excellence finalists:

Warren Buffett’s Mistake: How The Saint Of Capitalism Damaged His Reputation

From Saki Knafo, The Huffington Post

Yesterday morning, thousands of shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway, one of the world’s most well-regarded companies, flocked to a convention hall in Omaha, Nebraska, for a meeting with their venerated leader, Warren Buffett.

Over the course of his long and extremely lucrative career, Buffett has built a reputation for himself as a paragon of integrity and virtue, and the annual meeting of his company’s shareholders has come to resemble a sort of beatification ceremony, if you can imagine a religion in which the same person is beatified year after year. Buffett has called the gathering the “Woodstock of Capitalism,” nicely evoking both the massiveness of the crowd and the blissed-out vibe that pervades it. The vibe going into this year’s convention, however, was different.

The trouble began about five months ago, when David Sokol, a top lieutenant in Berkshire Hathaway, persuaded Buffett to take over a chemical-products manufacturer called Lubrizol. Buffett later said that he had initially been cool on the idea, and it’s hard not to wonder if something Sokol told him bothered him on some level, even an unconscious one. At some point in their conversation, Sokol had mentioned that he owned personal stock in Lubrizol (his lawyer says that Buffett was in fact informed of this not once but twice), yet he didn’t say how much he owned or how he’d come to own it.

As it turned out, Sokol had come to own the stock only a few weeks before, after learning about Lubrizol through a group of investment bankers who suggested that Berkshire look into buying the company. And as it also turned out, he’d come to own a lot of it — ten million dollars worth, to be exact. In other words, Sokol bought the shares knowing there was a chance he could convince Buffett to take over the company, which would almost certainly make the stocks’ value shoot up.

To Read More…